ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the cornerstone for ensuring the competence of testing and calibration laboratories worldwide. However, as highlighted in recent analyses, its attempt to provide a unified framework for both laboratory types has unveiled significant deficiencies, particularly for calibration laboratories. These challenges demand urgent attention to enhance clarity, compliance, and operational efficiency.
Key Challenges in ISO/IEC 17025:2017
- Ambiguity in Requirements
Many clauses, such as those addressing equipment (6.4) and uncertainty evaluation (7.6), lack specificity for calibration laboratories. This ambiguity forces laboratories to over-document or interpret requirements inconsistently, undermining uniformity. - Dominance of Testing Practices
The standard leans heavily towards testing laboratories, sidelining the unique operational needs of calibration labs. For example, reporting requirements (7.8) align more with test reports, offering limited guidance for calibration certificates that require precision traceability and environmental data. - Documentation Transparency
The absence of standardized templates and clear minimum requirements leads to inefficiencies. Calibration labs often over-document to compensate for vague guidelines, wasting resources while risking non-compliance during audits. - Difficulty in Implementation
Generalized language and insufficient examples make it challenging for laboratories, especially smaller or specialized ones, to interpret and implement the standard effectively.
The Case for Separate Standards
Given the distinct operational and service nature of testing and calibration laboratories, a single standard often struggles to address both adequately. Calibration labs, which prioritize precise measurement, traceability, and controlled environments, require tailored guidelines to ensure compliance and quality. A dedicated calibration standard could:
- Provide calibration-specific clauses for traceability, uncertainty evaluation, and environmental controls.
- Define unique reporting requirements for calibration certificates.
- Offer sector-specific examples to guide implementation.
Recommendations for Improvement
- Revising ISO/IEC 17025
Introduce tailored sections or annexes for calibration and testing laboratories. Clear methodologies, templates, and examples should be included to eliminate ambiguity. - Developing Separate Standards
Create distinct standards for calibration laboratories to address their specific needs, ensuring clarity and reducing compliance challenges. - Training and Awareness Programs
Develop comprehensive training modules that clarify complex requirements with real-world examples, enhancing understanding and implementation.
Conclusion
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is a robust framework but requires significant enhancements to address the unique needs of testing and calibration laboratories. By revising the standard or introducing separate guidelines, the accreditation process can become more transparent, efficient, and aligned with global best practices. This evolution will bolster trust and reliability in laboratory operations worldwide.
Please find the link to download here : https://blog.quality-pathshala.com/Article-ISO_17025_writing_guideline-01.pdf
About the Author
Dr. Sambhu Chakraborty is a distinguished consultant in quality accreditation for laboratories and hospitals. With a leadership portfolio that includes directorial roles in two laboratory organizations, a consulting firm, and chairman of International Organization of Laboratories ( An ILAC stakeholder organisation), Dr. Chakraborty is a respected voice in the field. For further engagement or inquiries, Dr. Chakraborty can be contacted through email at info@sambhuchakraborty.com and contact information are available on his websites,https://www.quality-pathshala.com and https://www.sambhuchakraborty.com, or via WhatsApp at +919830051583.